Discussion: C++ parser, etc.
C++ parser, etc.
dan at ikayzo.comFri Mar 3 06:58:20 HST 2006
- Previous message: C++ parser, etc.
- Next message: Important Updates
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ top page ]
Hi Jesse, > I would like it if you would host the C++ parser and PHP extension, > thanks. No problem. We can set you up with a Subversion account if you like. > Are there any coding standards I should follow? We don't yet have standards for C++ or PHP. Wherever possible, it would be great if you could preserve the approach, documentation standards, and "look" of the C# and Java public APIs. If someone is familiar with the Java API it should be easy for them to move over and use the C++ API. > How closely should the C++ parser follow the Java and C# API's? Should > it use the same naming style and function and class names? It would be great if you could follow them in terms of the public APIs. I realize some changes are necessary to make the APIs natural for the language being used. For example, using properties and indexers in C# where methods are required in Java. If you come up with a better way to handle parsing or the other internal mechanics, great. We may adopt improvements back into the Java and C# parsers. > Also, I am planning to use the STL in the C++ parser. Excellent. You will notice we used generics in both the Java and C# versions. > Does Ikayzo.org > have any established conventions on this? Not yet. Your approach may become the standard, especially if you are well versed in STL. Cheers, Dan
- Previous message: C++ parser, etc.
- Next message: Important Updates
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ top page ]










