Design Questions

[Daniel Leuck]

> hehe Now you're talking SDLPath.  The notation above simply references
> another Tag.  If you wanted a value of a tag, you'd have to use
> @bar[0] (for "some") or @bar[1] (for "object")
> 
> And of course you can do @bar['attr'] to refer to an attribute of a
> tag.  And if you want to refer to nested tags, simply use '/'.  For
> instance:
> 
> example @ref/nested[0]
> ref value {
>   nested foo
> }
> 
> @ref/nested[0] == value foo
> 
> Which is all well and good.  I'm most interested in getting an
> equivalent to the xml id and idref constructs, but a more full
> featured SDLPath would be nice, especially to have to avoid traversing
> the giant graph by hand when it comes time to process it.

I like this.  I think all of this should be supported.

Dan